Health 2.0: Addressable market opportunities

Peer-to-Peer ...

Image via Wikipedia

Interesting week in health 2.0, that was notable for a disagreement on the direction of Health 2.0 that turned personal between Matthew Holt and Dmitriy Kruglyak.

Fard Johnmar sums up nicely the potential steps going forward where the empowering/ democratizing models of health 2.0 meet real profit-sustaining enterprise.

Medical Decisions: This includes decisions about what medications physicians should prescribe and how to manage end of life care cost effectively.

Information Sharing: Providing valuable health data and education to consumers, providers, payers and others.

Medical Technology: Tools that help prolong lives, reduce administrative costs and meet emerging health needs.

Funding: Ensuring scarce health resources are allocated effectively and finding ways to stop breaking the healthcare budget.

To be successful, Health 2.0 companies must find clear ways to demonstrate to established health industry players that they can make a real impact on the four major problems I outlined above.  In the long run impact, not advertising dollars will determine company survival.

Its a good first step to defining where we as a community see the opportunities that will generate new businesses in health 2.0 and beyond.  The nice thing about highlighting opportunities is that as long as the basic needs are not well met, we will continue to see innovation that creates value every time these elements are addressed.  I would classify the opportunities a little differently than Fard, as follows:

  • Consumer decisions: Layperson-level decision support and information/metrics that helps consumers make decisions around everyday health, who to see when they need professional help, and navigation of options where next steps are not straightforward (ie end of life, experimental treatment pathways)
  • Provider decisions: Both qualitative and quantitative decision support tools that help providers deploy optimal treatments for their patients.  This could include peer to peer support, statistics and outcome projections, treatment comparisons, etc.
  • Care coordination: Information flows, data presentation, statistics, and oversight to coordinate care and highlight personalized priorities/highest impact activities
  • Therapeutic advances: Technological advances that allow for better treatment of specific issues
  • Finance: Reducing transactional expenses in the system, including billing, coding, underwriting, collections, overhead, etc.  This may include re-alignment of incentives, change in stakeholder payment structures/roles, business models, etc.

Where I disagree with Fard is that Health 2.0 companies need to prove impact to existing health industry players.  Instead, companies need to be able to pair traction against one of these issues with a business model that someone is willing to pay for (including advertisers).  The value chains created in the transition between wholesale. top-down manufacturing approaches and bottom-up consumer driven retail platforms will likely be a work in progress…and health 2.0 platforms looking to maximize their impact will likely need to create a new health systems infrastrucure.

The value of centering the system around consumers, as 2.0 technology does, will be reflected in new metrics to measure progress, likely:

  • Cost-value trade-offs vs. approved/not approved
  • Forward-looking individualized projections vs. standardized clinical trial results
  • Chief Complaint addressed vs. Review of Systems billed
  • Relationship vs. Volume
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

8 Responses to “Health 2.0: Addressable market opportunities”

  1. Headlines for September 22-23 | Health Content Advisors Says:

    […] » Health 2.0: Addressable market opportunities « Consumer-focused Health Care […]

  2. Health 2.0 links for 09-29-08 | The eDrugSearch Blog Says:

    […] Health 2.0: Addressable market opportunities (Consumer-focused Health Care) […]

  3. Health Fool Point Oh! « Crossover Healthcare Says:

    […] there is any substantive root cause that is worth your reading time. I would like to thank Fard and VJ, both of whom I know personally, for their insights and comments that help us focus on some things […]

  4. Waar liggen de kansen voor health2.0? - Frankwatching Says:

    […] Goel (Consumer focused care) worden een aantal prestatievelden van health2.0 benoemd.  Vooral de vijf velden van Goel bieden goede […]

  5. Waar liggen de kansen voor health2.0? « Wat zeggen de weblogs over (acute)zorg. Says:

    […] Goel (Consumer focused care) worden een aantal prestatievelden van health2.0 benoemd. Vooral de vijf velden van Goel bieden goede […]

  6. ICMCC Newspage » Blog Archive » Health2.0, definition, vision, opportunities and a goal Says:

    […] can make positive changes. In a reaction to a posting of Fard Johnmar, Vijay Goel, M.D. describes five elements. Well, I think there are […]

  7. Health2.0, definition, vision, opportunities and a goal | Nexthealth Says:

    […] health2.0 can make positive changes. In a reaction to a posting of Fard Johnmar, Vijay Goel, M.D. describes five elements. Well, I think there are […]

  8. Healthcare IT Blogs | Virtuate Says:

    […] 2.0 which I am sure we will follow a lot of his links to get better acquainted with some of the players.  Some of his other posts show that not everything is hugs and kisses in the health 2.0 debate.  […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: